Skip to Main Content | |
slider_circle_transparent

Empowering Government Efficiency and Transparency with E-Office Document Management System

introduction

eOffice is a cutting-edge digital platform meticulously crafted to revolutionize office management by eliminating the need for paper, fostering seamless communication and collaboration among government entities and employees, and ultimately boosting productivity. It offers a robust suite of tools, including electronic document management, workflow automation, digital signature capabilities, and task tracking functionalities, among others. eOffice empowers professionals with the flexibility of remote access to work-related files and tasks, facilitating work from any location. This versatile system enjoys widespread adoption in government agencies, corporate entities, and other sizable institutions seeking efficient and secure operational management.

Objective

To improve the user experience and website navigation, our goals are as follows-

Firstly, we aim to inform users about the services we offer, ensuring they have a clear understanding of what's available. Secondly, we intend to enhance the visual design of the website, making it both visually appealing and accessible to all users. Thirdly, we strive to simplify the cognitive load on users, making it easier for them to interact with our platform. Lastly, we are committed to building trust among our users, fostering confidence and reliability in their interactions with our website.

Target Audience

Government officials and employees aged 18 or older, who require access to upload or retrieve information such as documents, personal data, performance appraisal dossiers, etc., from the government database.

The Challenge

The existing website design is antiquated and falls short of meeting the requirements of contemporary users. It presents difficulties in terms of navigation, lacks visual appeal, and may not have been thoughtfully crafted with user needs in consideration. Consequently, this can result in a perplexing user experience and limited accessibility.

Research Phase

  • Current Information architecture
  • Discuss the existing information architecture of the website or platform, including its structure, content organization, and navigation pathways.

  • Overview of the Primary Flow on the Website
  • Explain how users currently navigate through the website or platform, highlighting any bottlenecks, drop-off points, or areas requiring improvement.

Usability Study Findings

Based on the usability study conducted on the eOffice website, several insights and issues were identified. These insights encompass user behavior, pain points, and preferences, and can be summarized as follows-

  • Interaction with the Landing Page- Users were observed to interact with the landing page through various actions, such as clicking on links, scrolling, and using the search function, indicating their engagement with the website.
  • Time Taken to Identify Services- Users took varying amounts of time to identify the services offered by the eOffice website, suggesting differences in the website's clarity and navigation ease.
  • Time Taken to Apply for a Service- The time it took for users to initiate and complete the application process for a selected service highlighted variations in the efficiency and user-friendliness of the application procedure.
Pain Points Visibility of System Status
  • Complex navigation made it challenging for users to locate necessary information.
  • The absence of a site map and quick links hindered easy exploration.
  • The lack of a language selector restricted accessibility for diverse user groups.
  • The homepage lacked substantial and relevant information, failing to engage and inform users effectively.
Match between System and Real World
  • The use of the unfamiliar term "implementation" may confuse users.
  • The absence of a recognizable Call-to-Action (CTA) button for getting started.
  • The lack of a language selector restricted accessibility for diverse user groups.
  • Icons on the website lacked direct relevance to their context.
Consistency and Standards
  • Inconsistent use of icons, typography, button styling, and color scheme contributed to a lack of uniformity.
Prioritizing Recognition over Recall
  • Absence of a "Get Started" CTA button in the header extended user navigation time, adding to cognitive load.
  • After login, users did not encounter tailored content.
  • The home page lacked a comprehensive list of available services.
  • The numerical data on the home page lacked meaningful relevance to users.
Flexibility and Efficiency of Use
  • Lack of convenient shortcuts or streamlined actions for users.
  • Absence of a direct CTA to contact a specific individual from a state.
  • Users were required to manually compose emails for communication.
  • Missing copy button for email addresses.
  • No sorting, filters, or search options were available for state data.
  • Emails were not formatted correctly, using "[at]" instead of "@" and "[dot]" instead of ".".
Aesthetic and Minimalistic Design
  • The user interface lacked clarity, making it challenging for users to understand CTAs, products, and value propositions due to insufficient highlighting.
  • Users struggled to comprehend the meaning and purpose of icons included in the design.
Help and Documentation
  • Users did not receive clear, accessible steps or guidelines on how to use the product, with these instructions buried at the end of the homepage amidst irrelevant information.
  • The website lacked a dedicated FAQ and help section.
  • Contacting customer support was not straightforward, as the ministry email was presented in a complex format.
Visual Design Audit
  • The brand logo appeared cluttered or confusing, which could affect brand recognition and memorability. (Poor Branding)
  • The header section lacked relevance to the brand or content, potentially misleading users.
Inconsistent Visuals and Layout
  • Inconsistency in visual elements and layout across various brand materials could erode brand trust and recognition.
Blurred Images
  • Inconsistency in visual elements and layout across various brand materials could erode brand trust and recognition.
Lack of Visual Hierarchy
  • Main products or key offerings did not receive adequate prominence, potentially resulting in missed sales opportunities.
Non-Intuitive Navigation
  • The non-intuitive navigation structure made it challenging for users to find their way around the website.
Inadequate CTA and Interaction Cues
  • Calls to action and interaction cues were not prominently placed, potentially hindering user engagement and conversions.
Color Scheme
  • Lack of a well-defined color palette-The absence of a clear set of colors led to inconsistency and randomness in color choices.
Inconsistent Typography & Iconography
  • Inconsistent font usage within images and the employment of multiple fonts led to typographic inconsistency.
  • Discrepancies in icon usage and visual symbols contributed to confusion and a lack of coherent visual messaging.
Accessibility Audit
  • Non-compliance with WCAG guidelines- The website failed to adhere to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), potentially excluding users with disabilities.
  • Single language support- Content was provided in only one language, limiting accessibility to a broader, multilingual audience.
  • Lack of alternative text for non-text content- Descriptive alternative text was notably absent for images and other non-text elements, making it difficult for users with visual impairments to understand and engage with the content.

In conclusion, the usability study identified a range of issues and pain points in the eOffice website, affecting user experience and accessibility for government officials and employees. Addressing these issues through redesign and improvements is essential to enhance the website's usability and effectiveness.

Synthesizing Phase

With the insights gathered during the research phase, we have gained valuable understanding of the users' interactions and challenges while using the website eOffice. Building on this knowledge, we have now entered the Defining phase, where our aim is to deepen our comprehension and transform the research findings into practical design solutions. To maintain a user-centric approach, we have created personas that embody essential user archetypes-

User Persona 1 Name-Sarah

Background- Government official in her mid-30s. Works in a government agency responsible for document management. Comfortable with technology but prefers user-friendly interfaces.

Frustrations

Sarah is frustrated with the difficulty of navigating the eOffice website, her struggle to identify available services, the non-standard email format for contacting authorities that wastes her time, the need to modify and send emails for access requests, and the lack of user-friendliness in the eOffice experience.

Needs and Wants

Sarah's needs and wants include the efficient electronic management of documents, reducing paperwork and streamlining processes, having a user-friendly eOffice platform, and achieving quick and hassle-free communication with other government entities.

Persona 2- Name- Raj

Background- Government employee in his late 40s. Limited experience with digital platforms. Prefers traditional paper-based processes.

Frustrations-

Raj is frustrated with the overwhelming complexity of the eOffice website, a lack of understanding regarding the purpose of eOffice, the absence of a clear "Get Started" option, and the difficulty in modifying and sending emails as requested.

Wants and Needs

Raj's needs and wants to encompass understanding the benefits of transitioning to eOffice, learning how to use the platform effectively, simplifying complex processes and interactions, accessing government documents and services more conveniently, and having a simplified and user-friendly introduction to eOffice.

Mapping User Journeys and Extracting Insights

We have chosen to focus on Sarah, a government official responsible for document management, to gain in-depth insights into her specific needs, pain points, and behaviors while using the eOffice platform. By mapping Sarah's user journey and experiences with eOffice, we aim to understand her interactions, emotions, frustrations, and overall user experience. This will help us identify areas for improvement and develop user-centered solutions.

Mapping the Journey to a "User Story"

After analyzing Sarah's user journey map, we have gained valuable insights into the actions, emotions, and pain points she encounters when using the eOffice platform. This journey map has been customized to Sarah's objectives and requirements as a government official responsible for document management. It highlighted key touchpoints where Sarah faced difficulties and provided insights for potential enhancements. Based on these observations, we have distilled one of Sarah's key needs into the following user story:

Sarah's User Story

"As a government official responsible for document management, I want a user-friendly and efficient eOffice platform that streamlines document management, reduces paperwork, and enables quick and hassle-free communication with other government entities, so I can improve my productivity and enhance the document management processes within my agency."

Framing Challenges and Hypothesis

Having analyzed Sarah's user journey as a government official responsible for document management, we can now formulate a problem statement that encapsulates the challenges she faces when using the eOffice platform.

Problem Statement

Sarah, a government official responsible for document management, faces difficulties in navigating the eOffice website, identifying available services, and accessing government documents efficiently. The non-standard email format for contacting authorities and the need to modify and send emails for access requests further hinder her productivity. The lack of user-friendliness in the eOffice experience results in inefficient document management processes within her agency.

This problem statement will guide our design efforts, ensuring that our solutions directly address Sarah's needs and enhance her overall experience with the eOffice platform. Building upon this problem statement, we can formulate a hypothesis:

Hypothesis Statement

If we redesign the eOffice platform to provide a more intuitive and user-friendly interface, simplify the document management processes, standardize communication methods, and offer comprehensive support and training, then Sarah's experience with the eOffice platform will become more efficient, productive, and user-friendly.

We believe that by addressing the identified challenges and implementing user-centric solutions, Sarah will have a more satisfying and productive experience while managing documents and communicating with other government entities through the eOffice platform. In the following sections, we will work towards transforming these insights into concrete design solutions, ensuring that Sarah's needs and wants are met.

Ideation and Exploration Phase

The ideation phase is a crucial stage in any project, where research, brainstorming, and idea evaluation are conducted to generate and assess feasible, viable, and desirable concepts. Here's a brief explanation of each point-

  • Research- Gather data, analyze trends, market conditions, and user needs for project assessment and improvement.
  • Brainstorming- Collaborative, creative idea generation without judgment to encourage diverse concepts regardless of feasibility or viability.
  • Evaluate- Scrutinize generated ideas based on predetermined criteria like feasibility, viability, and desirability.
  • FFeasibility Assessment- Evaluate ideas based on available resources, technology limitations, constraints, and risks for implementation determination.
  • Viability Assessment- Analyze market demand, revenue streams, costs, and sustainability to determine financial feasibility and goal alignment.
  • Desirability Evaluation- Assess ideas based on user needs, preferences, usability, and user experience for effective problem-solving.
  • Concept Generation- Research, brainstorming, and evaluation yield diverse concepts as potential pathways for development and refinement.
  • Advancement- Promising concepts meeting feasibility, viability, and desirability criteria are developed further for prototyping, testing, and implementation.

Overall, the ideation phase serves as a critical foundation for the project by generating a range of concepts and evaluating their potential, ensuring that only the most promising ideas are pursued further.

Solutions and Implementation

Outline the specific solutions proposed and implemented based on research findings, detailing design changes, content revisions, or technical modifications.

Validation and Conclusion

  • Usability Study Findings
  • Explain the process of conducting a validation usability study to assess the effectiveness of proposed solutions.

  • Presenting Validation through Analytical Data
  • Describe how the validation results were presented using analytical data to support conclusions and demonstrate improved usability and user experience.

  • Summarizing the Result of Our Intervention
  • Provide a summary of the outcomes and results of the project, emphasizing the positive changes made and the value brought to the target audience.

Our Thoughts and Next steps

Assess data, generate ideas, evaluate solutions, develop action plan, monitor progress, and implement improvements for enhanced usability and user experience. Provide an overview of challenges, research phase, synthesis phase, validation process, and final solutions implemented, highlighting improved usability and user experience.

Accessibility options by UX4G

Language
Created by logo
-->